Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The ability of a stretch of alternating dA-dT to adopt the left-handed Z form has been assessed by examining the behavior of the sequence d(CG)6(TA)4(CG)6 contained in the plasmid pBR322. The structural transition occurring within this sequence as a function of negative superhelicity was analyzed by several methods, including (1) the supercoiling-dependent unwinding of the insert as determined by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis, (2) the binding of anti-Z-DNA antibodies to the insert, (3) the sensitivity of the sequence to a single strand specific endonuclease, and (4) the sensitivity of the insert to digestion by a restriction endonuclease that cuts within the d(CG)6 segments when in the right-handed form. These studies have shown that in negatively supercoiled DNA the two d(CG)6 portions of the insert adopt the Z form, while the central d(TA)4 segment forms an underwound structure with a helical repeat that is best approximated as being intermediate between the B form and the Z form. A statistical mechanical treatment of the unwinding of the insert as a function of negative superhelicity provides an estimate of the minimum free energy required to convert an A-T bp from the B form to the Z form, as well as the free energy associated with the conversion of an A-T bp from the B form to the unwound form. These results strongly indicate that Z DNA is an unfavored structural alternative for stretches of d(AT)n in negatively supercoiled DNA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ellison et al. (1986) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: