Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The prevalence of diabetes mellitus was investigated in a northern Finnish community population aged 70 years or over. Of the eligible 483 persons, 78.5% (n = 379) took part in the study. The presence of diabetes mellitus was assessed by questions about the participants' previously diagnosed diabetes and 2 h oral glucose tolerance tests, which were performed according to the current WHO criteria. Only the participants who were on oral hypoglycaemic drugs or insulin treatment were excluded from the 2 h oral glucose tolerance tests. In the total population the prevalence of Type 2 diabetes was 22.0% among men and 28.2% among women; the difference between sexes was not significant (women's risk ratio (RR) 1.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.9-1.9). Among those aged 80 years or over the risk ratio for women was 11.3 compared with men (95% CI 1.6-79.5). Among men the prevalence was higher in the age group 70-79 years compared with those aged 80 years or over (RR 8.1, 95% CI 1.2-57.1). By contrast, among women, diabetes was less common among those aged 70-79 years compared with those aged 80 years or over (RR 0.6, 95% CI 0.4-1.0). The proportion of undiagnosed diabetes was clearly over one-third among men and just over one-third among women. Of men, 31.9% suffered from impaired glucose tolerance; the corresponding figure for women was 35.3%. The comparatively high proportion of undiagnosed diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance among elderly people lends support to the more frequent use of the 2 h glucose tolerance test in clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hiltunen et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: