Why the study?
Does indexed left atrial diameter predict late cardiovascular disease mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease without prior coronary heart disease?
Does indexed left atrial diameter predict late cardiovascular disease mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease without prior coronary heart disease?
Indexed left atrial diameter measured by echocardiography is a simple and independent predictor of cardiovascular mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease, providing prognostic value beyond stress SPECT imaging.
Indexed LA diameter was associated with CVD mortality in CKD beyond SPECT; hypothesis-generating and needs validation before clinical use.
AIMS: Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have high cardiovascular risk. Although stress imaging provides accurate risk estimation in this population, it is unknown if combinatorial cardiac imaging adds incremental value. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed transthoracic echocardiography and stress single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) to assess their value in predicting late cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality in 200 patients with creatinine clearance <60 mL/min without a history of coronary heart disease. During a median follow-up duration of 3.7 (3.5-4.0) years, there were 25 deaths because of CVD. Older age, abnormal SPECT, and increased indexed left atrial (LA) diameter were associated with CVD mortality on univariate analysis with P = 0.007, 0.01, and 0.004, respectively. In multivariable analysis, indexed LA diameter >24 mm/m(2) was independently predictive of CVD mortality [hazard ratio (HR) 2.75, confidence interval (CI) 1.14-6.59], but abnormal SPECT was not. Each mm/m(2) increase in indexed atrial diameter was associated with an HR 1.20 (95% CI 1.06-1.37). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with CKD, the indexed LA diameter predicts CVD mortality independent of an abnormal SPECT result. Consideration should be given to this simple measurement as a prognostic tool in this population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chan et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: