Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Competitive PCR of reverse transcribed mRNA sequences is used to quantify transcripts, but the usual approaches are labor-intensive and time-consuming. We describe the non-gel-based quantification of competitive reverse transcription (RT)-PCR products with use of microparticles and flow cytometry. METHODS: PCR products of a target sequence and an internal control sequence (competitor) were labeled during PCR using digoxigenin (DIG)- and dinitrophenol (DNP)-labeled primer, respectively, allowing specific binding to microparticles coated with the corresponding antibody. Both amplification products were biotinylated to enable fluorescence labeling with streptavidin-R-phycoerythrin. The mean fluorescence intensity of each microparticle population, corresponding to the amount of bound PCR product, was measured in a flow cytometer. We constructed microparticles coated with antibodies against DIG and DNP to specifically capture PCR products derived from target and competitor sequences, respectively. RESULTS: As required for a reliable competitive PCR assay, nearly identical kinetics were found for the amplification of target and competitor sequences when using only one competitive primer. The method was applied to examine interleukin-8 expression in human lymphocytes after x-irradiation. One hour after irradiation, the concentration of transcripts decreased by half. CONCLUSIONS: The flow cytometric assay for the quantification of competitive RT-PCR products avoids additional hybridization steps and antibody labeling. The use of paramagnetic microparticles would also enable the complete automation of this method.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wedemeyer et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: