Why the study?
Does porcine small intestinal submucosa implantation induce myocardial regeneration and preserve cardiac function in a porcine model of left ventriculotomy?
Does porcine small intestinal submucosa implantation induce myocardial regeneration and preserve cardiac function in a porcine model of left ventriculotomy?
Implantation of porcine small intestinal submucosa in the left ventricle of pigs promotes angiomuscular regeneration without impairing cardiac function.
Hypothesis-generating for SIS-induced myocardial regeneration in large animals; leaves open clinical translation pending further validation.
INTRODUCTION: Most cardiomyocytes do not regenerate after myocardial infarction. Porcine small intestinal submucosa has been shown to be effective in tissue repair. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate myocardial tissue regeneration and functional effects of SIS implantation in pigs after left ventriculotomy. METHODS: Fifteen pigs were assigned to two groups: porcine small intestinal submucosa (SIS) (N=10) and control (N=5). The SIS group underwent a mini sternotomy, left ventriculotomy and placement of a SIS patch. The control group underwent a sham procedure. Echocardiography was performed before and 60 days after the surgical procedure. Histological analysis was performed with hematoxylin-eosin stain and markers for actin 1A4, anti sarcomeric actin, connexin43 and factor VIII. RESULTS: Weight gain was similar in both groups. Echocardiography analysis revealed no difference between groups regarding end diastolic and systolic diameters and left ventricular ejection fraction, both pre (P=0.118, P=0.313, P=0.944) and post procedure (P=0.333, P=0.522, P=0.628). Both groups showed an increase in end diastolic (P<0,001 for both) and systolic diameter 60 days after surgery (P=0.005, SIS group and P=0.004, control group). New cardiomyocytes, blood vessels and inflammatory reactions were histologically identified in the SIS group. CONCLUSION: SIS implantation in pigs after left ventriculotomy was associated with angiomuscular regeneration and no damage in cardiac function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ramos et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: