Why the study?
Does baseline NT-proBNP predict outcomes and explain treatment differences in STEMI patients undergoing PCI with or without tenecteplase facilitation?
Does baseline NT-proBNP predict outcomes and explain treatment differences in STEMI patients undergoing PCI with or without tenecteplase facilitation?
Baseline NT-proBNP strongly predicts 90-day and 1-year outcomes in STEMI patients undergoing PCI, but does not explain the lower mortality rate seen with primary PCI alone compared to facilitated PCI.
AIMS: N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels predict outcomes in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients treated with fibrinolysis or primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, its role in facilitated PCI has not yet been assessed; it may be a tool to evaluate the lower event rates with primary PCI in ASSENT-4. METHODS AND RESULTS: In ASSENT-4, 1667 patients were randomized to tenecteplase (TNK) followed by PCI or primary PCI alone. Baseline, discharge/Day 7, and 90-day NT-proBNP levels were available for 1008, 971, and 813 patients. Increasing quartiles of baseline NT-proBNP levels were associated with a higher risk of the combined endpoint of death, heart failure, and shock at 90 days and 1-year mortality (P < 0.001). Events were more common with TNK + PCI, regardless of baseline NT-proBNP quartile. When analysing baseline NT-proBNP as a continuous variable, no treatment interaction was observed for the primary endpoint (P = 0.17) or 1-year mortality (P = 0.08). Overall, NT-proBNP levels at Day 7 or 90 were not different between the two treatments. In patients with TIMI 2-3 flow before PCI, NT-proBNP at Day 90 was lower in PCI-only patients (P = 0.01), although no interaction was observed (P = 0.14). In TNK-pre-treated patients without reperfusion (TIMI 0-1) after PCI, NT-proBNP levels at Day 7 or 90 were not significantly higher than in PCI patients. CONCLUSION: Baseline NT-proBNP predicts outcome at 90 days and 1 year in patients undergoing PCI with or without facilitation with TNK. A higher rate of reperfusion in lytic-pre-treated patients did not result in lower NT-proBNP during follow-up. Thus, baseline and subsequent NT-proBNP levels do not explain the lower mortality rate with PCI alone seen in this trial.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sinnaeve et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: