Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Questions strict BP <130/80 mm Hg target in CKD; leaves open the optimal goal for randomized trials.
Discussions| September 03 2010 Debate: CON Position. People with Chronic Kidney Disease Should Have a Blood Pressure Lower than 130/80 mm Hg Subject Area: Nephrology Rajiv Agarwal Rajiv Agarwal Indiana University School of Medicine and Richard L. Roudebush Veterans Administration Medical Center, Indianapolis, Ind., USA Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Am J Nephrol (2010) 32 (4): 374–376. https://doi.org/10.1159/000319637 Article history Published Online: September 03 2010 Content Tools Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Rajiv Agarwal; Debate: CON Position. People with Chronic Kidney Disease Should Have a Blood Pressure Lower than 130/80 mm Hg. Am J Nephrol 1 October 2010; 32 (4): 374–376. https://doi.org/10.1159/000319637 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentAll JournalsAmerican Journal of Nephrology Search Advanced Search This content is only available via PDF. © 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel2010Copyright / Drug Dosage / DisclaimerCopyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements. Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rajiv Agarwal (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: