Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper proposes a novel paradigm to generate a parameterized model of the response of linear circuits with the inclusion of worst case bounds. The methodology leverages the so-called Taylor models and represents parameter-dependent responses in terms of a multivariate Taylor polynomial, in conjunction with an interval remainder accounting for the approximation error. The Taylor model representation is propagated from input parameters to circuit responses through a suitable redefinition of the basic operations, such as addition, multiplication or matrix inversion, that are involved in the circuit solution. Specifically, the remainder is propagated in a conservative way based on the theory of interval analysis. While the polynomial part provides an accurate, analytical and parametric representation of the response as a function of the selected design parameters, the complementary information on the remainder error yields a conservative, yet tight, estimation of the worst case bounds. Specific and novel solutions are proposed to implement complex-valued matrix operations and to overcome well-known issues in the state-of-the-art Taylor model theory, like the determination of the upper and lower bound of the multivariate polynomial part. The proposed framework is applied to the frequency-domain analysis of linear circuits. An in-depth discussion of the fundamental theory is complemented by a selection of relevant examples aimed at illustrating the technique and demonstrating its feasibility and strength.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Trinchero et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: