Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper explores how the state employs digital technologies in its pacification of dissident political bodies, subjectivities, and communicative capabilities. It explores strategies of resistance to the surveillance practices which come to the fore as a state form, as a means of social control, and as a mechanism for creating manageable and disciplined crowds. Drawing upon ethnographic data, it focuses on the contemporary politics of the Kurdish movement in Turkey. In particular, it analyses the digitized surveillance and resistance of Kurds, both of which function as crucial components of contemporary power regimes in Turkey.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Burçe Çelik (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: