Why the study?
DSE is used in potential heart donors, but heart rate reserve during DSE in brain death had not been assessed.
Does brain death reduce heart rate reserve during dipyridamole stress echocardiography in potential heart donors compared to patients with coronary artery disease?
Does brain death reduce heart rate reserve during dipyridamole stress echocardiography in potential heart donors compared to patients with coronary artery disease?
Heart rate reserve is almost abolished in brain-dead potential heart donors during dipyridamole stress echocardiography, indicating that neural input modulation is essential for HRR but not for the inotropic response.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Blunted HRR in brain-dead donors warrants no practice change; leaves open neural modulation of chronotropy for prospective donor studies.
BACKGROUND: A blunted heart rate reserve (HRR) during dipyridamole stress echocardiography (DSE) is a prognostically unfavorable sign of cardiac autonomic dysfunction. Short-term adjustments of heart rate (HR) are thought to rise from changes in neural input to the heart. DSE is applied in potential heart donors to rule out underlying coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction. The aim of this study is to assess HRR during DSE in brain death. METHODS: We enrolled two groups: group 1 (N.=49, 22 men, 54.6±8.8 years) with patients in brain death enrolled in the nationwide marginal donor heart recruiting program; group 2 (N.=49, 18 men, 66.4±12.0 years) referred to DSE for suspected or known coronary artery disease. All underwent DSE (0.84 mg/kg in 6') by quality-controlled readers certified via web-based training (1487/CE Lazio-1). We assessed left ventricular contractile reserve (LVCR) as stress/rest ratio of force (systolic blood pressure/end-systolic volume). HRR was calculated as the peak/rest HR ratio from 12-lead EKG. RESULTS: The two study groups were similar for prevalence of inducible ischemia (4/49 vs. 9/49, P=NS). Group 1 showed higher resting HR (group 1: 88.1±15.5 bpm vs. group 2: 66.5±11.5 bpm, P<0.01) and similar peak HR (group 1: 94.7±15.3 bpm vs. group 2: 89.5±19.3 bpm, P=0.144), with blunted HRR (group 1: 1.08±0.10 bpm vs. group 2: 1.36±0.31 bpm, P<0.01). HRR was unrelated to LVCR. CONCLUSIONS: HRR is almost abolished and unrelated to LVCR in brain-dead patients during DSE. The modulation of neural input to the heart is essential to determine HRR, and plays no significant role in determining the inotropic response during DSE.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bombardini et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: