Why the study?
Few studies have focused on 3-month functional outcomes after intravenous thrombolysis, anticoagulation, or antiplatelet therapy administered within 4.5 hours of cardiogenic cerebral embolism onset.
Does hyperacute treatment with thrombolysis or anticoagulation improve 3-month functional prognosis compared to antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute cardiogenic cerebral embolism within 4.5 hours of onset?
Does hyperacute treatment with thrombolysis or anticoagulation improve 3-month functional prognosis compared to antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute cardiogenic cerebral embolism within 4.5 hours of onset?
In patients with acute cardiogenic cerebral embolism, hyperacute treatment with thrombolysis, anticoagulation, or antiplatelet therapy within 4.5 hours of onset resulted in similar 3-month functional outcomes after propensity score matching.
Supports equipoise among hyperacute therapies; should not change practice and warrants RCTs in acute cardiogenic embolism.
BACKGROUND: Few studies focused on the functional outcomes of patients at 3 months after receiving intravenous thrombolysis, anticoagulation, or antiplatelet therapy within 4.5 h of onset of the cardiogenic cerebral embolism (CCE) subtype. METHODS: The purpose of this retrospective study was to analyse the clinical data of patients with acute CCE and compare the 3-month functional prognoses of patients after administration of different antithrombotic therapies within 4.5 h of stroke onset. A total of 335 patients with CCE hospitalized in our institution were included in this study. The patients were stratified according to the hyperacute treatment received, and baseline clinical and laboratory data were analysed. A 3-month modified Rankin scale (mRS) score of 0-2 was defined as an excellent functional outcome. RESULTS: A total of 335 patients were divided into thrombolytic (n = 78), anticoagulant (n = 88), and antiplatelet therapy groups (n = 169). A total of 164 patients had a good prognosis at 3 months (mRS ≤ 2). After adjustments were made for age and National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, each group comprised 38 patients, and there were no significant differences in sex composition, complications, lesion characteristics, or Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project (OSCP) classification among the three groups. The plasma D-dimer level (µg/ml) in the thrombolytic group was significantly higher than those in the anticoagulant and antiplatelet groups [3.07 (1.50,5.62), 1.33 (0.95,1.89), 1.61 (0.76,2.96), P < 0.001]. After one week of treatment, the reduction in NIHSS in the thrombolytic group was significantly greater than those in the other two groups [3.00 (1.00, 8.00), 1.00 (0.00, 5.00), 1.00 (0.00, 2.00), P = 0.025]. A total of 47 patients (41.2 %) had an mRS score of ≤ 2 at 3 months, and 23 patients died (20.2 %). There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients with a good prognosis or the mortality rate among the three groups (P = 0.363, P = 0.683). CONCLUSIONS: Thrombolytic therapy is effective at improving short-term and 3-month prognoses. Anticoagulant therapy may be a safe and effective treatment option for patients with the cardiac stroke subtype who fail to receive intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (r-tPA) thrombolysis within 4.5 h in addition to antiplatelet therapy, as recommended by the guidelines.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hu et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: