Why the study?
The study was conducted to evaluate the efficiency of menstrual blood stromal/stem cells and their derived conditioned medium on cardiac function in a myocardial infarction rat model.
Does administration of MenSCs suspended in Conditioned Medium improve cardiac function and reduce scar size in a rat model of myocardial infarction?
Does administration of MenSCs suspended in Conditioned Medium improve cardiac function and reduce scar size in a rat model of myocardial infarction?
MenSCs suspended in conditioned medium significantly improved cardiac function and reduced scar size in a rat MI model via mechanisms including mitochondrial transfer and NF-κB inhibition.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports MenSC+CM exploration in preclinical MI models; leaves open translation to human therapy.
Background: To evaluate the efficiency of Menstrual blood Stromal/Stem Cells (MenSCs) administration in Myocardial Infarction (MI), the effects of MenSCs and their derived conditioned Medium (CM) on cardiac function in MI rat model was assessed. Methods: after ligation of left anterior descending coronary artery into the infarct border zone. Results: The results showed a significant reduction in scar size after injection of MenSCs+CM compared to MI group. Ejection fraction and fractional shortening of MenSCs+CM group were higher than CM and MI group at day 28. Administration of MenSCs+CM led to much more survival of cardiomyocytes, and prevention of meta-plastic development. Moreover, human mitochondrial transfer from MenSCs to cardiomyocytes was seen in group treated by MenSCs+CM. Indeed, MenSCs+CM treatment evoked nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) down-regulation more than other treatments. Conclusion: MenSCs+CM treatment could significantly ameliorate cardiac function by different mechanisms including inhibition of cartilaginous metaplasia, inhibition of NF-κB and mitochondrial transfer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Manshori et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: