Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Research Article| November 01, 1977 Spatial distribution and focal mechanisms of mantle earthquakes in the Hindu Kush–Pamir region: A contorted Benioff zone Selena Billington; Selena Billington 1Department of Geological Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853 Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Bryan L. Isacks; Bryan L. Isacks 1Department of Geological Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853 Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Mauwia Barazangi Mauwia Barazangi 1Department of Geological Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853 Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Geology (1977) 5 (11): 699–704. https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(1977)5<699:SDAFMO>2.0.CO;2 Article history first online: 02 Jun 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation Selena Billington, Bryan L. Isacks, Mauwia Barazangi; Spatial distribution and focal mechanisms of mantle earthquakes in the Hindu Kush–Pamir region: A contorted Benioff zone. Geology 1977;; 5 (11): 699–704. doi: https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(1977)5<699:SDAFMO>2.0.CO;2 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyGeology Search Advanced Search Abstract Seismological evidence based on the spatial distribution and focal mechanism solutions of mantle earthquakes in the Hindu Kush–Pamir region supports a model in which suboceanic lithosphere that existed between the converging Eurasian and Indian continents is subducted into the upper mantle. Two lines of evidence support this model. First, a careful selection of well-defined hypocenters in the region from 1950 through 1973 defines a thin (about 25 km thick) contorted Benioff zone within the upper mantle. The zone dips steeply (about 70°) toward the north in the western part of the region and has a shallower dip (about 50°) toward the southeast in the eastern part of the region. Second, focal mechanism solutions of intermediate-depth earthquakes have extensional (T) axes oriented parallel to the dip of the Benioff zone. The thin slab-like distribution of hypocenters and the downdip extensional stress are similar to features found in many other more typical regions of active lithospheric subduction. In addition, comparison of the focal mechanism solutions and the spatial distribution of earthquakes demonstrates the presence of a fault plane at about 200 km depth within the western part of the subducted lithosphere. Similar fault planes have also been observed in other areas of subduction. Comparison of the seismicity of the Hindu Kush–Pamir region with the apparent lack of mantle earthquakes along the main Himalayan arc suggests that the region is the site of the final stage of subduction of suboceanic lithosphere along the collision boundary between the Indian and Eurasian plates. This content is PDF only. Please click on the PDF icon to access. First Page Preview Close Modal You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Billington et al. (1977) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: