Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analyses of the clay mineralogy of samples from the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary layer at four localities show that the boundary clay is neither mineralogically exotic nor distinct from locally derived clays above and below the boundary. The significant ejecta component in the clay that is predicted by the asteroid-impact scenario was not detected.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rampino et al. (1983) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: