Why the study?
Does ultrasound PIV accurately measure flow velocity vector fields compared to optical PIV in an in vitro model?
Does ultrasound PIV accurately measure flow velocity vector fields compared to optical PIV in an in vitro model?
Ultrasound PIV shows close correlation and agreement with optical PIV for measuring velocity vectors, though out-of-plane velocity components cause measurement distortions.
Ultrasound PIV shows in vitro promise; leaves open clinical translation pending in vivo validation.
OBJECTIVES: We performed an in vitro study to assess the precision and accuracy of particle imaging velocimetry (PIV) data acquired using a clinically available portable ultrasound system via comparison with stereo optical PIV. METHODS: The performance of ultrasound PIV was compared with optical PIV on a benchmark problem involving vortical flow with a substantial out-of-plane velocity component. Optical PIV is capable of stereo image acquisition, thus measuring out-of-plane velocity components. This allowed us to quantify the accuracy of ultrasound PIV, which is limited to in-plane acquisition. The system performance was assessed by considering the instantaneous velocity fields without extracting velocity profiles by spatial averaging. RESULTS: Within the 2-dimensional correlation window, using 7 time-averaged frames, the vector fields were found to have correlations of 0.867 in the direction along the ultrasound beam and 0.738 in the perpendicular direction. Out-of-plane motion of greater than 20% of the in-plane vector magnitude was found to increase the SD by 11% for the vectors parallel to the ultrasound beam direction and 8.6% for the vectors perpendicular to the beam. CONCLUSIONS: The results show a close correlation and agreement of individual velocity vectors generated by ultrasound PIV compared with optical PIV. Most of the measurement distortions were caused by out-of-plane velocity components.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Westerdale et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: