Why the study?
Does high fetal umbilical artery Doppler pulsatility index predict cardiovascular risk factors in children at age 12 years?
Does high fetal umbilical artery Doppler pulsatility index predict cardiovascular risk factors in children at age 12 years?
High fetal umbilical artery Doppler pulsatility index is associated with some cardiovascular risk factors at age 12 in univariate analysis, but this association disappears after adjusting for confounders.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
High fetal UAD PI shows no independent link to childhood arterial compliance or homocysteine after adjustment; leaves open its value as a predictor of later cardiovascular risk.
UNLABELLED: Abstract Objective: To determine if high umbilical artery Doppler (UAD) pulsatility index (PI) is associated with cardio-vascular (CV) risk-factors in children at age 12 years. METHODS: We studied 195 children at age 12 years who had had in-utero UAD studies performed at 28 weeks' gestation. The children were grouped according to whether their umbilical Doppler PI was high (indicating poor feto-placental circulation) or normal. At age 12 years we assessed CV risk factors, including anthropometric measures, blood pressure, pulse wave velocity (a measure of arterial compliance), cardio-respiratory fitness, and homocysteine and cholesterol serum levels. RESULTS: Compared with children with a normal UAD PI (N = 88), the children (N = 107) with high UAD PI had higher resting pulse rate (p = 0.04), higher pulse wave velocity (p = 0.046), higher serum homocysteine levels (p = 0.032) and reduced arterial compliance (7.58 versus 8.50 m/s, p = 0.029) using univariate analysis. These differences were not present when adjusting for cofounders was modeled. CONCLUSION: High PI on UAD testing in-utero may be associated with increased likelihood of some CV risk factors at age 12-years but confounding variables may be as important. Our study raises possible long-term benefits of in-utero UAD measurements.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mone et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: