Why the study?
Does aspirin reduce the risk of cardiovascular events in outpatients with stable atherosclerosis with and without prior ischemic events?
Does aspirin reduce the risk of cardiovascular events in outpatients with stable atherosclerosis with and without prior ischemic events?
Aspirin may offer marginal cardiovascular benefit in stable atherosclerosis patients with prior ischemic events, but shows no apparent benefit in those without prior ischemic events.
Supports continued aspirin use for secondary prevention but questions its value in stable atherosclerosis without prior events;.
BACKGROUND: The benefit of aspirin among patients with stable atherosclerosis without a prior ischemic event is not well defined. HYPOTHESIS: Aspirin would be of benefit in outpatients with atherosclerosis with prior ischemic events, but not in those without ischemic events. METHODS: Subjects from the Reduction of Atherothrombosis for Continued Health registry were divided according to prior ischemic event (n =21 724) vs stable atherosclerosis, but no prior ischemic event (n = 11 872). Analyses were propensity score matched. Aspirin use was updated at each clinic visit and considered as a time-varying covariate. The primary outcome was the first occurrence of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. RESULTS: In the group with a prior ischemic event, aspirin use was associated with a marginally lower risk of the primary outcome at a median of 41 months (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.65-1.01, P = 0.06). In the group without a prior ischemic event, aspirin use was not associated with a lower risk of the primary outcome at a median of 36 months (HR: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.73-1.45, P = 0.86). CONCLUSIONS: In this observational analysis of outpatients with stable atherosclerosis, aspirin was marginally beneficial among patients with a prior ischemic event; however, there was no apparent benefit among those with no prior ischemic event.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bavry et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: