OBJECTIVES: Associative memory, the ability to bind and retrieve relationships between unrelated elements, is a cornerstone of human cognition and a primary target for neurorehabilitation. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) has emerged as a promising method to modulate the locus coeruleus-norepinephrine system and hippocampal-prefrontal circuits essential for memory. However, the comparative efficacy of noninvasive modalities such as electrical transcutaneous VNS (E-taVNS) and the emerging field of ultrasound (U-taVNS) remains poorly understood in the context of active recall. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, participants performed a cross-modal video-word associative memory task before and after receiving either E-taVNS or U-taVNS in active and sham conditions. We investigated whether these modalities enhance cued recall accuracy and retrieval reaction time. RESULTS: Our results revealed that neither E-taVNS nor U-taVNS significantly improved recall accuracy. However, E-taVNS significantly accelerated response times specifically for correctly recalled items. These findings suggest that although taVNS may not increase the likelihood of recalling associative memories after a brief retention interval, electrical stimulation may enhance the efficiency with which we do so. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that E-taVNS is a viable tool for facilitating memory processes, although further research is required to optimize ultrasound parameters and validate mechanistic pathways through physiologic monitoring.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Griffiths et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: