Why the study?
Does statin treatment improve vascular endothelial function in outpatients with stable coronary heart disease?
Does statin treatment improve vascular endothelial function in outpatients with stable coronary heart disease?
Statin therapy and the control of risk factors such as smoking and blood glucose are associated with improved endothelial function in patients with stable coronary artery disease.
Statin use was associated with improved endothelial function in stable CAD; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before practice change.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate vascular endothelial function and contributing factors in coronary heart disease (CHD) patients. METHODS: One hundred twenty six CHD outpatients were randomly recruited. Reactive hyperemia index (RHI) <1.67 indicates endothelial dysfunction. Correlation between RHI and different biochemical parameters was evaluated. RESULTS: RHI in patients receiving statins treatment was significantly higher than patients without statins treatment (P<0.05). RHI in patients with more than 3 risk factors for CHD was also markedly lower than that in patients with ≤2 risk factors (P<0.05). Patients with lesions at several branches of coronary artery had a markedly lower RHI when compared with those with coronary lesions at a single branch (P<0.05). For patients without statins treatment, RHI increased significantly after statins treatment for 1 month (P=0.01). In patients with endothelial dysfunction, FBG, HbA1C, hs-CRP and Hcy were significantly higher than those in patients with normal endothelial function (P<0.05 for all). Smokers with CHD had a remarkably lower RHI when compared with non-smokers (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Smoking, FBG, HbA1C, Hcy and hs-CRP are significantly associated with endothelial dysfunction. Endothelial dysfunction is also related to the numbers of risk factors for CHD, degree of coronary lesions and statins. Statins treatment may significantly improve the endothelial function of CHD patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: