Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Carbonaceous aerosols (CA), composed of black carbon (BC) and organic matter (OM), significantly impact the climate. Light absorption properties of CA, particularly of BC and brown carbon (BrC), are crucial due to their contribution to global and regional warming. We present the absorption properties of BC (b Abs,BC ) and BrC (b Abs,BrC ) inferred using Aethalometer data from 44 European sites covering different environments (traffic (TR), urban (UB), suburban (SUB), regional background (RB) and mountain (M)). Absorption coefficients showed a clear relationship with station setting decreasing as follows: TR > UB > SUB > RB > M, with exceptions. The contribution of b Abs,BrC to total absorption (b Abs ), i.e. %Abs BrC , was lower at traffic sites (11–20 %), exceeding 30 % at some SUB and RB sites. Low AAE values were observed at TR sites, due to the dominance of internal combustion emissions, and at some remote RB/M sites, likely due to the lack of proximity to BrC sources, insufficient secondary processes generating BrC or the effect of photobleaching during transport. Higher b Abs and AAE were observed in Central/Eastern Europe compared to Western/Northern Europe, due to higher coal and biomass burning emissions in the east. Seasonal analysis showed increased b Abs , b Abs,BC , b Abs,BrC in winter, with stronger %Abs BrC , leading to higher AAE. Diel cycles of b Abs,BC peaked during morning and evening rush hours, whereas b Abs,BrC , %Abs BrC , AAE, and AAE BrC peaked at night when emissions from household activities accumulated. Decade-long trends analyses demonstrated a decrease in b Abs , due to reduction of BC emissions, while b Abs,BrC and AAE increased, suggesting a shift in CA composition, with a relative increase in BrC over BC. This study provides a unique dataset to assess the BrC effects on climate and confirms that BrC can contribute significantly to UV–VIS radiation presenting highly variable absorption properties in Europe.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rovira et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: