Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Calculations of 4f → 4f electric dipole intensity parameters are reported for six different lanthanide (III) systems whose solid-state structures and optical spectra have been well characterized. In each case, the ligands are considered to have isotropic electronic charge distributions, and the 4f → 4f intensity parametrization is expressed in terms of the parameters Aλλ±1,p(λ=2, 4, and 6), which have been defined in a previous paper (see paper I). The calculations include contributions to these parameters from both the static-coupling and dynamic-coupling intensity mechanisms. Comparisons between the calculated and empirically determined signs of the Aλλ±1,p parameters suggest that, in most cases, the dynamic-coupling mechanism makes the dominant contributions to the Aλλ+1,p parameters. The empirically determined signs of the Aλλ−1,p parameters correlate with those calculated on the basis of the static-coupling mechanism. For isotropic ligands, the dynamic-coupling mechanism cannot contribute to the Aλλ−1,p parameters. Intrinsic intensity parameters, defined within the context of the mechanism-independent superposition model for lanthanide-ligand interactions, are also derived for each of the six systems examined here. These parameters, denoted herein as Āλλ±1, are defined to be independent of coordination number, coordination geometry, and lanthanide site symmetry.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Reid et al. (1983) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: