Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Based on reported success and safety, 1121 sigmoidoscopies were performed in 964 patients seen privately by one surgeon, as a routine office screening procedure, using the flexible 60-cm sigmoidoscope instead of the rigid 25-cm instrument. The doubling of the distance that was examined doubled the diagnostic yield for neoplasia and inflammatory bowel disease, specific or nonspecific. As compared with barium-enema examinations, the yield was even greater: 5:1 for neoplasia, 7:1 for inflammation, 3:1 for polyps greater than 1 cm, and 5:1 for false-negative, false-positive, or equivocal x-ray findings. No serious complications were encountered in any of the examinations including 72 polypectomies performed in the office. The study supports flexible fiberoptic sigmoidoscopy as a major screening tool for individuals in private practice in truly evaluating the interior of the lower 60-cm of the colorectum for neoplasia and for the diagnosis and monitoring of bowel disease or neoplasia confined to that area.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
John R. Hilsabeck (1983) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: