Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The effect of salt on the intercalation of acridine dyes and DNA is rather well explained by the Gouy‐Chapman double‐layer theory as applied to a cylinder model of the DNA–dye complex. The free energy of transfer of a dye ion from the bulk solution to the complex is divided into several parts, one of which, Δ F 0 , accounts for the short‐range, nonelectrostatic interactions. The assumption that Δ F 0 should not depend on the amount of dye in the complex leads to an internal dielectric constant of the cylinder of about D i = 7. The scatter in Δ F 0 values, as calculated from individual experimental points, is of order 0.5 kT per dye ion. This scatter is large enough to mask possible effects of heterogeneity in DNA sequences. The calculations are made for a long cylinder with radius 10 Å, with the DNA phosphate charges smeared uniformly at the surface, a uniform spacing of dye charges at the cylinder axis, and a length of b = 3.37 Å per base pair. Each intercalated dye ion also adds a length b to the total length of the cylinder. The salt‐dependent part of the electric free energy of intercalation, Δ F 1 , is tabulated for complexes with r = 0–0.24 dye ions per DNA phosphate in 0.002–0.2 M monovalent salt and dye solutions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bustamante et al. (1984) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: