The study identifies a novel nifedipine-insensitive, high voltage-activated Ca2+ channel predominantly expressed in the terminal mesenteric artery of guinea pigs, which may contribute to peripheral arteriole tone regulation.
We have found nifedipine-insensitive (NI), rapidly inactivating, voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels (current, NI-I(Ca)) with unique biophysical and pharmacological properties in the terminal branches of guinea pig mesenteric artery, by using a whole-cell mode of the patch-clamp technique. The fraction of NI-I(Ca) appeared to increase dramatically along the lower branches of mesenteric artery, amounting to almost 100% of global I(Ca) in its periphery. With 5 mmol/L Ba2+ as the charge carrier, NI-I(Ca) was activated with a threshold of -50 mV, peaked at -10 mV, and was half-activated and inactivated at -11 and -52 mV, respectively, generating a potential range of constant activation near the resting membrane potential. The NI-I(Ca) was rundown resistant, was not subject to Ca(2+)-dependent inactivation, and exhibited the pore properties typical for high voltage-activated Ca2+ channels; Ba2+ is approximately 2-fold more permeable than Ca2+, and Cd2+ is a better blocker than Ni2+ (IC(50), 6 and 68 micromol/L, respectively). Relatively specific blockers for N- and P/Q-type Ca2+ channels such as omega-conotoxins GVIA and MVIIC (each 1 micromol/L) and omega-agatoxin IVA (1 micromol/L) were ineffective at inhibiting NI-I(Ca), whereas nimodipine partially (10 micromol/L; approximately 40%) and amiloride potently ( approximately 75% with 1 mmol/L; IC(50); 107 micromol/L) blocked the current. Although these properties are reminiscent of R-type Ca2+ channels, expression of the alpha(1E) mRNA was not detected using reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. These results strongly suggest the predominant presence of NI, high voltage-activated Ca2+ channels with novel properties, which may be abundantly expressed in peripheral small arterioles and contribute to their tone regulation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Morita et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: