Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: To compare higher-order aberrations (HOAs) and visual function in eyes with a toric intraocular lens (IOL) and eyes with a nontoric IOL. SETTING: Hayashi Eye Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan. DESIGN: Case-control study. METHODS: Eyes that had phacoemulsification were enrolled in 1 of the following 3 groups: (1) preoperative corneal astigmatism of 1.00 diopter (D) with a toric IOL (toric group), (2) astigmatism of 1.00 D or more with a nontoric IOL (high-astigmatism group), and (3) astigmatism less than 1.00 D with a nontoric IOL (low-astigmatism group). Ocular and corneal HOAs were measured using a wavefront analyzer. Photopic and mesopic visual acuities at high- to low-contrast visual targets were measured using a contrast sensitivity tester. RESULTS: The mean ocular and corneal total HOAs and 3rd-order aberrations in the toric and high-astigmatism groups tended to be greater than in the low-astigmatism group; HOAs and 3rd-order aberrations at 3 months and HOAs at 6 months were significantly different (P ≤.0403). The mean corrected visual acuity did not differ significantly between groups. However, photopic low-contrast visual acuity (LCVA) and mesopic high- to low-contrast visual acuity was significantly worse in the toric and high-astigmatism groups than in the low-astigmatism group (P ≤.0210). CONCLUSION: Postoperatively, ocular and corneal HOAs were greater in eyes with a toric IOL and in eyes with high preexisting corneal astigmatism than in eyes with low preexisting astigmatism, which impaired photopic LCVA and mesopic visual acuity. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hayashi et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: