Why the study?
Traditional ECG interpretation relies on expert knowledge that is time-consuming and costly, while AI models often lack clinically desired explainability.
Does an explainable AI method using VAE improve the prediction of left ventricular function from ECG signals compared to state-of-the-art VAE methods?
Does an explainable AI method using VAE improve the prediction of left ventricular function from ECG signals compared to state-of-the-art VAE methods?
An explainable AI model using VAEs can accurately predict left ventricular function from ECGs while providing visual context for interpretation, potentially reducing the time and expertise required for ECG analysis.
May aid ECG-based LVF assessment; extends VAE methods but leaves clinical validation open.
OBJECTIVE: The interpretation of electrocardiogram (ECG) signals is vital for diagnosis of cardiac conditions. Traditional methods rely on expert knowledge, which is time consuming, costly and potentially misses subtle features. AI has shown promise in ECG interpretation, but clinically desired model explainability is often lacking in literature. METHODS: We introduce an explainable AI method for ECG classification by partitioning the variational autoencoder (VAE) latent space into a label-specific and a non-label-specific subset. By optimizing both subsets for signal reconstruction and one subset also for prediction while constraining the other from learning label-specific information with an adversarial network, the latent space is disentangled in a supervised manner. This latent space is leveraged to create enhanced visualizations for ECG feature interpretation by means of attribute manipulation. As a proof of concept, we predict the left ventricular function (LVF), a critical prognostic determinant in cardiac disease, from the ECG. RESULTS: Our study demonstrates the effective segregation of LVF-specific information within a single dimension of the VAE latent space, without compromising classification performance. We show that the proposed model improves state-of-the-art VAE methods (AUC 0.832 vs. 0.790, F1 0.688 vs. 0.640) in prediction and performs comparable to ground truth LVF (concordance 0.72 vs.0.72) in predicting survival. CONCLUSION: The model facilitates the interpretation of LVF predictions by providing visual context to ECG signals, offering a general explainable and predictive AI method. SIGNIFICANCE: Our explainable AI model can potentially reduce time and expertise required for ECG analysis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Valk et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: