Why the study?
Does extended-duration thromboprophylaxis with low molecular weight heparins or nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants prevent venous thromboembolism in acutely ill medical patients?
Does extended-duration thromboprophylaxis with low molecular weight heparins or nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants prevent venous thromboembolism in acutely ill medical patients?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Extended-duration thromboprophylaxis beyond hospital stay is not recommended for acutely ill medical patients due to a lack of clinically relevant benefit in recent trials.
Low molecular weight heparins and fondaparinux have been the cornerstones for prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in acutely ill medical patients for almost two decades. Guidelines recommend the use of these parenteral anticoagulants for 6 to 14 days but advise against extended-duration thromboprophylaxis after hospital discharge because no compelling scientific evidence has been provided for pharmacological prophylaxis beyond hospital stay. Five large randomized clinical trials, one with low molecular weight heparin and four with nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants, have failed to show significant clinically relevant benefit in this indication. Obviously, the development of VTE is more complex in medical patients than in patients undergoing major surgical procedures. Thus, it can be expected that guideline recommendations for VTE prevention with low molecular weight heparins or fondaparinux in medical patients will remain unchanged in 2019.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sylvia Haas (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: