Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Galaxy clusters possess turbulent magnetic fields with a dominant scale length l B ≃ 1-10 kpc. In the static magnetic field approximation, the thermal conductivity κ T for heat transport over distances ≫ l B in clusters is ≃κ S l B / L S (ρ e ), where κ S is the Spitzer thermal conductivity for a nonmagnetized plasma, the length L S ( r 0 ) is a characteristic distance that a pair of field lines separated by a distance r 0 < l B at one location must be followed before they separate by a distance l B , and ρ e is the electron gyroradius. We introduce an analytic Fokker-Planck model and a numerical Monte Carlo model of field-line separation in strong magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) turbulence to calculate L S ( r 0 ). We also determine L S ( r 0 ) using direct numerical simulations of MHD turbulence with zero mean magnetic field. All three approaches, like earlier models, predict that L S asymptotes to a value of order several l B as r 0 is decreased toward l d in the large- l B / l d limit, where l d is the dissipation scale, which is taken to be the proton gyroradius. When the turbulence parameters used in the Fokker-Planck and Monte Carlo models are evaluated using direct numerical simulations, the Fokker-Planck model yields L S (ρ e ) ≃ 4.5 l B and the Monte Carlo model yields L S (ρ e ) ≃ 6.5 l B in the large- l B / l d limit. Extrapolating from our direct numerical simulations to the large- l B / l d limit, we find that L S (ρ e ) ≃ 5 l B -10 l B , implying that κ T ≃ 0.1κ S -0.2κ S in galaxy clusters in the static field approximation. We also discuss the phenomenology of thermal conduction and particle diffusion in the presence of time-varying turbulent magnetic fields. Under the questionable assumption that turbulent resistivity completely reconnects field lines on the timescale l B / u , where u is the rms turbulent velocity, we find that κ T is enhanced by a moderate amount relative to the static field estimate for typical cluster conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chandran et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: