Why the study?
Do acute changes in oxygen tension or atorvastatin treatment affect flow-mediated dilation in patients with cardiovascular risk?
Do acute changes in oxygen tension or atorvastatin treatment affect flow-mediated dilation in patients with cardiovascular risk?
Hypoxia reduces endothelial vasodilation and oxygen supplementation causes vasoconstriction, physiological effects that are not modified by high-dose atorvastatin therapy.
Acute oxygen tension changes may impair endothelial function in at-risk patients; leaves open atorvastatin effects beyond lipid lowering.
OBJECTIVE: Oxygen-dependent changes in vascular diameters may be detrimental when the endothelium is dysfunctional. DESIGN: Endothelial responsiveness was evaluated by brachial ultrasound and flow-mediated/nitroglycerin-mediated dilation (FMD/NMD). FMD/NMD was investigated in males with increased risk of cardiovascular disease (mean age 44+/-2 years, n=10) and matched controls without risk factors (44+/-2 years, n=10). FMD/NMD was assessed during normoxia (21% O2, 79% N2), while inhaling hypoxic gas (12.5% O2, FMDHyp/NMD), and 100% O2 supplementation (FMDO2/NMD). In a second study we addressed the effect of lipid lowering. Twenty persons with cardiovascular risk (mean age 50+/-2 years) were treated with atorvastatin (80 mg/day) and FMD/NMD was measured during normoxia, hypoxia and oxygen supplementation before, after 1 day and 3 months. RESULTS: Oxygen supplementation evoked vasoconstriction, while FMDHyp/NMD was reduced compared to FMD/NMD. Atorvastatin significantly lowered total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and ADMA after 1 day of treatment, while triglycerides, ApoB and hsCRP were lowered after 3 months. Atorvastatin did not change FMD/NMD irrespective of oxygen tension. CONCLUSION: Irrespective of risk factors or atorvastatin, hypoxia reduced endothelial vasodilation while oxygen supplementation evoked vasoconstriction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fröbert et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: