Why the study?
Does proteomic analysis of CSF improve the detection of leptomeningeal metastases in CNS lymphoma compared to standard cytological protocols?
Does proteomic analysis of CSF improve the detection of leptomeningeal metastases in CNS lymphoma compared to standard cytological protocols?
Proteomic analysis of CSF offers a more sensitive approach than standard cytology for detecting leptomeningeal metastases in CNS lymphoma.
May improve diagnostic yield for leptomeningeal metastases in CNS lymphoma; leaves open the need for prospective.
INTRODUCTION: Leptomeningeal metastases (LM) from lymphoma remain a difficult complication for oncologist due to the high incidence in morbidity and mortality. Early diagnostic and initiation of treatment are essential to prevent neurological deterioration. Areas covered: In this review, several proteomic approaches are described in order to help and provide the basis for the identification of biomarkers useful in early diagnosis, also in discovery novel targets for therapeutic agents. In fact, the identification of biomarkers will have a high potential to detect leptomeningeal lymphoma, as well as to predict its progression and treatment response. Expert commentary: In the case of LM by Central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma, these studies generated the first insights into the utility of proteomic analysis for biomarker identification and will be demonstrated that identifying specific proteins in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) had much greater sensitivity for detecting LM in comparison to standard cytological protocols.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Galicia et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: