Why the study?
Does the use of ultrasound contrast agents (Sonovue) in echocardiography carry an acceptable risk of adverse reactions compared to its diagnostic benefits?
Does the use of ultrasound contrast agents (Sonovue) in echocardiography carry an acceptable risk of adverse reactions compared to its diagnostic benefits?
The risk of severe adverse reactions with ultrasound contrast agents like Sonovue appears very low and should be carefully weighed against their diagnostic benefits.
Low severe reaction rates with Sonovue support cautious use; leaves open need for prospective safety data in unselected patients.
The introduction of ultrasound contrast agents has led to a marked improvement in diagnostic capabilities in echocardiography. As no serious adverse events were seen during the preclinical development phase, ultrasound contrast agents were thought to be safe. Recently, three fatal and 19 severe, non-fatal adverse reactions were reported in a post marketing analysis of more than 150,000 studies of Sonovue, which has led to the addition of several contra-indications for the use of this ultrasound contrast agent. Although a strong relationship was established between the non-fatal cases and administration of Sonovue, a causal relationship between the fatal cases and the use of Sonovue is debatable. Therefore, the risk associated with the use of this ultrasound contrast agent should be judged carefully, taking into consideration the prevalence of adverse effects of other contrast media and diagnostic procedures used in cardiology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dijkmans et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: