Why the study?
Does IVUS-guided PCI improve long-term clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness compared to conventional PCI in male patients with stable angina?
Does IVUS-guided PCI improve long-term clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness compared to conventional PCI in male patients with stable angina?
IVUS-guided PCI is associated with improved long-term clinical outcomes and lower costs compared to conventional angiography-guided PCI in male patients with stable angina.
No abstract yet. The journal hasn't published one we can show.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sagar N. Doshi (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: