Why the study?
Traditional auscultation requires high-level medical skill and computational respiratory sound analysis has limits in constrained locations, necessitating a wearable device for real-time respiratory health monitoring.
The developed LSTM-based Respiratory Sound Diagnosis Processor Unit demonstrates high accuracy, low power consumption, and small area suitable for wearable respiratory health monitoring.
May enable low-power wearable respiratory monitors; leaves open clinical validation before practice adoption.
Early prevention and detection of respiratory disease have attracted extensive attention due to the significant increase in people with respiratory issues. Restraining the spread and relieving the symptom of this disease is essential. However, the traditional auscultation technique demands a high-level medical skill, and computational respiratory sound analysis approaches have limits in constrained locations. A wearable auscultation device is required to real-time monitor respiratory system health and provides consumers with ease. In this work, we developed a Respiratory Sound Diagnosis Processor Unit (RSDPU) based on Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM). The experiments and analyses were conducted on feature extraction and abnormality diagnosis algorithm of respiratory sound, and Dynamic Normalization Mapping (DNM) was proposed to better utilize quantization bits and lessen overfitting. Furthermore, we developed the hardware implementation of RSDPU including a corrector to filter diagnosis noise. We presented the FPGA prototyping verification and layout of the RSDPU for power and area evaluation. Experimental results demonstrated that RSDPU achieved an abnormality diagnosis accuracy of 81.4 %, an area of 1.57 × 1.76 mm under the SMIC 130 nm process, and power consumption of 381.8 μW, which met the requirements of high accuracy, low power consumption, and small area.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhou et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: