Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose of review We aim to evaluate the efficacy of risk-based surveillance strategies for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) patients, addressing key questions: How can risk stratification enhance early detection? What are cost-effective approaches across diverse settings? How may novel diagnostic tools enhance surveillance? Recent findings Recent studies highlight a persistent risk of HCC despite antiviral therapy, with reported annual incidences of 0.01–5.4% depending on cirrhosis status. Validated scores (e.g., PAGE-B, mPAGE-B, REAL-B) improve risk stratification, while liver stiffness measurement (LSM) and biomarkers, such as GALAD, enhance detection sensitivity, ranging from 54% to 91%. Economic analyses support cost-effectiveness when annual HCC risk ≥ 0.2%, with ultrasound ± AFP as the surveillance backbone. Advanced modalities like CT/MRI and liquid biopsies have shown promise, while AI-driven models and virologic markers (e.g., HBcrAg) are emerging as dynamic predictors. Summary Risk-based surveillance, guided by scores and LSM, effectively targets high-risk HBV patients, reducing mortality and optimizing resources. These emerging tools hold promise for earlier detection, but validation and cost-effectiveness require further research. This approach will impact future studies by prioritizing personalized, globally adaptable strategies to achieve HBV elimination goals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Attia et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: