Why the study?
Does essential hypertension alter left ventricular topography and diastolic function compared to normal adults?
Does essential hypertension alter left ventricular topography and diastolic function compared to normal adults?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A decrease in peak filling occurs early in the evolution of hypertensive heart disease and is observed even when systolic performance is still normal.
Left ventricular topography and diastolic and systolic functions were studied in 41 patients with essential hypertension (group 1) and 33 age-matched normal adults (group 2) by Doppler echocardiography. In group 1 54% had LV concentric hypertrophy, 19% had combined concentric hypertrophy and eccentric remodeling, and 27% had concentric remodeling. LV systolic function was within the normal range. In concentric LV remodeling, the EDV was significantly decreased (compared with group 2) (84 +/- 15 vs 130 +/- 38 ml, p < 0.05), whereas the NPFR was normal (2.89 +/- 0.65 vs 3.22 +/- 0.83 sec-1, p = NS). In concentric hypertrophy, LV end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes were normal, but the NPFR was decreased (2.04 +/- 0.59 sec-1). Patients with concentric hypertrophy and eccentric remodeling had the largest end-diastolic (140 +/- 48 ml) and end-systolic (62 +/- 32 ml) volumes and the lowest NPFR (1.67 +/- 0.69 sec-1). The LVMI inversely correlated with the NPFR (r = -0.89, p < 0.0001). Thus LV concentric hypertrophy with or without concentric or eccentric remodeling is seen in patients with systemic hypertension. A decrease in peak filling occurs early in the evolution of hypertensive heart disease and is observed even when systolic performance is still normal.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ren et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: