Key result
Emergency department thrombolysis eligibility criteria yield an ~81% positive predictive value for true acute MI.
Why the study?
The clinical impact of thrombolytic therapy eligibility criteria among emergency room patients with acute chest pain was uncertain.
What is the true-positive and false-positive rate of clinical and ECG criteria for thrombolysis eligibility in emergency room patients with acute chest pain?
Cohort (n=7,734)
Yes
What is the true-positive and false-positive rate of clinical and ECG criteria for thrombolysis eligibility in emergency room patients with acute chest pain?
Only a small fraction of AMI patients meet strict thrombolysis eligibility criteria in the ER, and standard criteria yield a false-positive rate that could lead to inappropriate treatment if based on a single ECG.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Strict criteria limit thrombolysis eligibility in AMI with notable false-positive risk; leaves open whether adjusted thresholds improve ER decision-making.
Study objective To assess the potential clinical impact of thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction by determining true-positive and false-positive rates of criteria for eligibility among emergency room patients with acute chest pain. Design Prospective multicenter cohort study. Setting Emergency rooms of three university and four community hospitals. Patients Emergency room patients (7734) with acute chest pain. Measurements and main results Only 261 (23%) of 1118 patients with acute myocardial infarctions were 75 years of age or younger, presented within 4 hours of the onset of pain, and had emergency room electrocardiograms showing probable acute myocardial infarction: 60 (0.9%) of the 6616 patients without infarction also met these criteria (positive predictive value, 261/321 = 81%; CI, 77% to 86%). The positive predictive value could increase to about 88% (CI, 82% to 93%) if eligibility were based on the official hospital electrocardiogram reading. Conclusions Because experience from published studies suggests that about one third of patients who meet these three eligibility criteria have other contraindications to thrombolysis, we estimate that about 15% of patients with acute myocardial infarction would meet the criteria for eligibility for thrombolysis that have been used in clinical trials at the time of emergency room presentation. Further, for every eight patients with true-positive results who are treated, one to two patients with false-positive results may also be treated if decisions are based on the interpretation of a single electrocardiogram.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thomas H. Lee (1989) conducted a cohort in Acute chest pain (n=7,734). Thrombolysis eligibility criteria (age ≤75 years, presentation within 4 hours, and ECG showing probable AMI) vs. Patients without acute myocardial infarction was evaluated on Positive predictive value of eligibility criteria for acute myocardial infarction (Positive predictive value 81%, 95% CI 77% to 86%). Eligibility criteria for thrombolysis in emergency room patients with acute chest pain yielded a positive predictive value of 81% (95% CI, 77% to 86%) for true acute myocardial infarction.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: