On the immanence of the ethical: A response to Michael Lempert, ‘No ordinary ethics’

Michael Lempert’s misleading critique of what I have called ordinary ethics provides a welcome invitation to clarify my perspective. I briefly address what I mean by immanence and point to my argument that the ethical is intrinsic to action and practice rather than discernable only as a discrete object or distinct product of linguistic interaction. Lempert’s invocation of entanglement is fine but, with respect to my argument, beside the point.