PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 28, 2000Archives of Internal Medicine137 citations

Oral Anticoagulation Treatment in the Elderly

View Full Paper
GPGualtiero PalaretiCLCristina LegnaniCMCesare Manotti

Structured PICO

Does oral anticoagulant treatment increase the risk of bleeding and thrombotic events in elderly patients compared to younger patients?

P
Population
922 patients starting oral anticoagulant treatment (OAT), comprising 461 patients aged ≥75 years and 461 patients aged <70 years matched for sex, OAT indication, and treating center.
I
Intervention
Oral anticoagulant treatment (OAT) in elderly patients (aged ≥75 years)
C
Comparator
Oral anticoagulant treatment (OAT) in younger patients (aged <70 years)
O
Outcome
Bleeding and thrombotic eventshard clinical

Elderly patients on oral anticoagulation face significantly higher risks of fatal bleeding and thrombotic events compared to younger patients, highlighting the need for careful moderate anticoagulation (INR 2.0-3.0).

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Whether elderly patients are at increased risk of complications during oral anticoagulant treatment (OAT) is still a matter of debate. METHOD: Bleeding and thrombotic events occurring during OAT in 461 patients, aged 75 years or older when they started OAT, and in 461 patients younger than 70 years, matched for sex, OAT indication, and treating center, were examined in a prospective, multicenter, inception-cohort study. RESULTS: Bleeding rate was 9.9% and 6.6% patient-years in elderly and young patients, respectively (P = .07), and 2.1% and 1.1% for major bleeding (P = .19); 6 and 1 events, respectively, were fatal (all intracranial, relative risk, 6.4; P = .05). In the elderly, bleeding rate was lower (4.5%) for international normalized ratios (INRs) between 2.0 and 2.9; it was higher during the first 90 treatment days (P = .05) and when arterial vascular disease was the indication for OAT (P = .03). Thrombosis rate was 4.2% and 2.5% patient-years in elderly and young patients, respectively (P = .10); however, 13 and 5 events were fatal (relative risk, 2.8; P = .04). Thrombosis rate was lower (1.5%) for INRs between 2.0 and 2.9; it was higher during the first 90 treatment days (P<.001) and 6 of 7 venous events occurred at lower than 2.0 INRs. CONCLUSIONS: A nonsignificant trend was noted toward a higher rate of both bleeding and thrombotic complications in elderly vs matched younger patients. Intracranial bleeding and fatal thrombotic events were significantly more frequent in the elderly. Our results also indicate that lower than 2.0 INRs do not preclude bleeding in the elderly nor offer adequate protection from thrombotic events. Moderate anticoagulation (2.0-3.0 INRs) in elderly patients seems the safest and most effective.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Palareti et al. (2000) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a83b9eb62f5b6e6a7fe20e0https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.160.4.470
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper