OCT evaluation at 8 months post-implantation of everolimus-eluting stents demonstrates nearly complete and uniform neointimal coverage with very low rates of malapposition, indicating favorable vessel healing.
Supports favorable healing with everolimus-eluting stents; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation of clinical outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate detailed vessel response after everolimus-eluting stents (EES) implantation in human de novo coronary lesions by optical coherence tomography (OCT). DESIGN, SETTING AND PATIENTS: Between November 2008 and October 2009, 25 patients (14 men, 65.5±8.6 years) with de novo native coronary artery lesions were implanted with 30 EES, and OCT was performed at 8 months post-implantation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Neointimal thickness (NIT) on each strut, strut apposition to the vessel wall, the frequency of struts surrounded by low intensity area and the incidence of intra-stent thrombus were analysed. To evaluate the radial unevenness of NIT, the difference between the maximum and minimum NIT (dNT) was calculated for each cross-section. RESULTS: At 236±39 days after implantation, there were no major adverse cardiac events, nor target vessel revascularisation. A total of 5,931 struts was evaluated by OCT. The median NIT was 80 μm (25th and 75th percentile 50 μm and 140 μm) and average NIT was 100±74 μm. The number of neointima-covered struts was 5,834 (98.4%), and 31 (0.52%) struts showed malapposition without neointimal coverage. The number of struts surrounded by low intensity area was 452 (7.62%). Eleven EES (37%) showed full neointimal coverage. No intra-stent thrombus was detected. The average dNT was 108±77 μm. CONCLUSIONS: Most EES struts were covered with uniform and thin neointima. The frequency of low-intensity neointima was very low, which may be a result of promoted vessel healing. These results may support improved clinical outcomes with EES in clinical trials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shite et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: