Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Assessments of commercial assays in detecting herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) antibodies have shown variable sensitivity and specificity, and variation in performance by global population. OBJECTIVE: 1 and 2 Immunoblot IgG and Euroimmun Anti-HSV-1/HSV-2 gG2 Euroline-WB (IgG/IgM). STUDY DESIGN: Blood specimens were drawn from blood donors between 2013-2016 in Doha, Qatar. Twenty specimens from ten nationalities (Egypt, Iran, Jordan, Lebanon, Pakistan, Palestine, Qatar, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen; total = 200) were randomly selected and tested for HSV-2 antibodies. RESULTS: In the six possible assay comparisons, Cohen's kappa statistics indicated fair to good agreement, ranging between 0.57 (95% CI 0.28-0.86) and 0.69 (95% CI 0.44-0.95). Meanwhile, positive percent agreement ranged between 50.0 (95% CI 18.7-81.3%) and 63.6% (95% CI 30.8-89.1%); negative percent agreement ranged between 97.8% (95% CI 94.4-99.4%) and 99.5% (95% CI 97.0-100.0%); and overall percent agreement ranged between 95.8% (95% CI 91.9-97.9%) and 97.5% (95% CI 94.2-98.9%). The two ELISA kits demonstrated comparable sensitivities and specificities ≥50% and >98%, respectively, with respect to the IB/WB assays. CONCLUSION: The study provided, for the first time, primary data on performance of these assays in diagnosing HSV-2 infection in MENA populations. Findings support comparable performance and utility of these assays, and demonstrate challenges in establishing seropositivity (versus seronegativity).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nasrallah et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: