Why the study?
What is the voluntary participation rate in community nutrition education among people with coronary heart disease, and is there a self-selection bias based on dietary risk?
What is the voluntary participation rate in community nutrition education among people with coronary heart disease, and is there a self-selection bias based on dietary risk?
Voluntary participation in community nutrition education by people with heart disease is low and subject to self-selection bias, with those at highest dietary risk being least likely to attend.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Low voluntary uptake of community nutrition education in CHD signals self-selection bias; leaves open whether targeted outreach improves reach to highest-risk patients.
A qualitative food-frequency questionnaire was administered by mail to a representative sample of 137 people previously diagnosed with possible or definite myocardial infarct. Seventy-eight percent of subjects returned a completed questionnaire and were subsequently invited to attend local tastings of foods with the National Heart Foundation Tick of Approval. These tastings were organised and promoted with the active involvement of the local branch of the Australian Cardiac Association. The purpose of this study was to measure voluntary participation by people with coronary heart disease in community nutrition education and to identify any self-selection bias with respect to eating habits among the participants. A dietary risk score, which was the proportion of all food choices that were high in fat, was calculated from the data. Eighteen per cent of subjects who answered also participated in the food tastings; there was a statistically significant association between membership of the Australian Cardiac Association and being a participant. Participants had a significantly lower risk score (P < 0.01) after adjustment for age, sex and membership of the association. The results suggest that voluntary participation by people with heart disease in community nutrition education is low and that there is a self-selection bias, with those at highest dietary risk being least likely to attend. The use of existing community networks to recruit participants is also discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Helen Elliott (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: