Why the study?
Does Therapeutic Touch reduce anxiety, regulate vital signs, and decrease cardiac dysrhythmia in women undergoing cardiac catheterization?
Does Therapeutic Touch reduce anxiety, regulate vital signs, and decrease cardiac dysrhythmia in women undergoing cardiac catheterization?
Therapeutic touch may be an effective non-pharmacological approach to reduce state anxiety and cardiac dysrhythmias during cardiac catheterization in women.
Therapeutic Touch may be integrated into cardiac catheterization care for women to reduce anxiety and dysrhythmias; extends RCT evidence for complementary therapies in procedural settings.
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: To investigate the effects of Therapeutic Touch (TT) on anxiety, vital signs, and cardiac dysrhythmia in women undergoing cardiac catheterization. DESIGN: It was a quasi-experimental study. The participants had no history of hallucination, anxiety, or other psychological problems. Participants had to be conscious and have attained at least sixth-grade literacy level. Participants were randomly assigned into an intervention group (n = 23; received 10-15 minutes TT), a placebo group (n = 23; received 10-15 minutes simulated touch), and a control group (n = 23; did not receive any therapy). Data were collected using Spielberger's anxiety test, cardiac dysrhythmia checklist, and vital signs recording sheet. Statistical analyses were considered to be significant at α = .05 levels. FINDINGS: Sixty-nine women ranging in age from 35 to 65 years participated. TT significantly decreased state anxiety p < 0.0001 but not trait anxiety (p = .88), decreased the incidence of all cardiac dysrhythmias p < 0.0001 except premature ventricular contraction (p = .01), and regulated vital signs p < 0.0001 in the intervention group versus placebo and control group. CONCLUSIONS: TT is an effective approach for managing state anxiety, regulating vital signs, and decreasing the incidence of cardiac dysrhythmia during stressful situations, such as cardiac catheterization, in Iranian cardiac patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zolfaghari et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: