This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
The transition toward sustainable energy systems demands accelerated materials discovery. This requirement drives the development of fully automated chemical laboratories. While multifingered dexterous hands offer the kinematic flexibility required to manipulate complex laboratory glassware, deploying them in safety-critical chemical environments remains a formidable challenge. Existing data-driven grasping models prioritize geometric stability but largely overlook strict functional constraints, often producing grasps that occlude vessel openings and cause sample contamination. To address this critical bottleneck, we present ChemGrasp, an affordance-aware dexterous grasping framework tailored for laboratory automation. Our approach introduces a task-specific affordance module during the inference phase of a generative model, employing an energy-based optimization function to strictly penalize semantic violations. Furthermore, to evaluate execution feasibility in constrained simulated workspaces, ChemGrasp integrates a system-level motion planning pipeline featuring a phased hand execution strategy, enabling collision-free and kinematically reachable trajectories in simulation. Extensive physics-based simulations demonstrate that ChemGrasp significantly elevates the safe success rate by eliminating functional violations, reliably executing dynamic grasp sequences in both floating and full-pipeline tabletop settings. Ultimately, this framework demonstrates a simulation-validated step toward adapting robotic dexterity to laboratory safety protocols for autonomous clean energy research.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: