Why the study?
Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists or adrenalectomy improve left ventricular hypertrophy in primary aldosteronism, but cardiovascular benefit on MRA could depend on plasma renin concentration.
Does plasma renin concentration suppression affect the regression of left ventricular hypertrophy in primary aldosteronism patients treated with MRA compared to adrenalectomy?
Does plasma renin concentration suppression affect the regression of left ventricular hypertrophy in primary aldosteronism patients treated with MRA compared to adrenalectomy?
In patients with primary aldosteronism treated with MRA, unsuppressed plasma renin concentration is associated with greater regression of left ventricular hypertrophy, suggesting MRA dosing should target renin unsuppression.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Suppressed PRC on MRA may limit LVH regression in PA; leaves open whether renin-guided titration improves cardiac outcomes.
CONTEXT: Primary aldosteronism (PA) causes left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) via hemodynamic factors and directly by aldosterone effects. Specific treatment by mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) or adrenalectomy (ADX) has been reported to improve LVH. However, the cardiovascular benefit could depend on plasma renin concentration (PRC) in patients on MRA. PATIENTS AND OBJECTIVE: We analyzed data from 184 patients from the Munich center of the German Conn's Registry, who underwent echocardiography at the time of diagnosis and 1 year after treatment. To assess the effect of PRC on cardiac recovery, we stratified patients on MRA according to suppression (n = 46) or non-suppression of PRC (n = 59) at follow-up and compared them to PA patients after ADX (n = 79). RESULTS: At baseline, patients treated by ADX or MRA had comparable left ventricular mass index (LVMI, 61.7 vs 58.9 g/m2.7, P = 0.591). Likewise, patients on MRA had similar LVMI at baseline, when stratified into treatment groups with suppressed and unsuppressed PRC during follow-up (60.0 vs 58.1 g/m2.7, P = 0.576). In all three groups, we observed a significant reduction in LVMI following treatment (P < 0.001). However, patients with suppressed PRC had no decrease in pro-BNP levels, and the reduction of LVMI was less intense than in patients with unsuppressed PRC (4.1 vs 8.2 g/m2.7, P = 0.033) or after ADX (9.3 g/m2.7, P = 0.019). Similarly, in multivariate analysis, higher PRC was correlated with the regression of LVH. CONCLUSION: PA patients with suppressed PRC on MRA show impaired regression of LVH. Therefore, dosing of MRA according to PRC could improve their cardiovascular benefit.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Köhler et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: