Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Finite element analysis reveals distinct buckling modes and knockdown factors in near-perfect spherical shells, highlighting the role of numerical discretization in stability predictions.
We present the results from a numerical investigation using the finite element method to study the buckling strength of near-perfect spherical shells containing a single, localized, Gaussian-dimple defect whose profile is systematically varied toward the limit of vanishing amplitude. In this limit, our simulations reveal distinct buckling behaviors for hemispheres, full spheres, and partial spherical caps. Hemispherical shells exhibit boundary-dominated buckling modes, resulting in a knockdown factor of 0.8. By contrast, full spherical shells display localized buckling at their pole with knockdown factors near unity. Furthermore, for partial spherical shells, we observed a transition from boundary modes to these localized buckling modes as a function of the cap angle. We characterize these behaviors by systematically examining the effects of the discretization level, solver parameters, and radius-to-thickness ratio on knockdown factors. Specifically, we identify the conditions under which knockdown factors converge across shell configurations. Our findings highlight the critical importance of carefully controlled numerical parameters in shell-buckling simulations in the near-perfect limit, demonstrating how precise choices in discretization and solver parameters are essential for accurately predicting the distinct buckling modes across different shell geometries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ubamanyu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: