The thrombin and 5-HT2 receptors have distinct desensitization mechanisms, with the carboxyl terminus of the thrombin receptor being sufficient to trigger rapid uncoupling.
Receptor tail motifs may dictate signaling duration in thrombosis and vasoreactivity; leaves open whether these mechanisms can be targeted in cardiovascular models.
We have compared the desensitization of two receptors, the thrombin receptor which displays dual coupling to both pertussis toxin-sensitive (Gi) and -insensitive (Gq) proteins and the serotonin type 2 (5-HT2) receptor which selectively couples to Gq. In the case of the thrombin receptor, cleavage induces activation and irreversible receptor modification followed by rapid (T1/2 = 3 min) and extensive desensitization of the receptor's ability to modulate phospholipase C (Gq). 5-HT-induced desensitization of its receptor is markedly slower (T1/2 = 10 min) and by 60 min only 50% of the phospholipase C response is lost. This effect occurs with a parallel disappearance of 5-HT receptors from the cell surface. Whole cell phosphorylation studies showed that the thrombin receptor is rapidly phosphorylated upon activation. In contrast, the 5-HT2 receptor displays a low basal level of phosphorylation which is not increased upon agonist treatment. The cytoplasmic tail of the 5-HT2 receptor which contains several protein kinase consensus sequences was found not to be involved in receptor activation or desensitization. However, a chimeric receptor having the core of the 5-HT2 receptor and the cytoplasmic tail of the thrombin receptor was able to undergo 5-HT-induced desensitization and phosphorylation. These results indicate that (i) both 5-HT2 and thrombin receptors have unique shut-off mechanisms, and (ii) that sequences in the carboxyl terminus of the thrombin receptor are sufficient to trigger rapid uncoupling of the receptor from its G protein(s) and downstream effector(s).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vouret‐Craviari et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: