This paper considers a two-stage assembly flow shop problem where m parallel machines are in the first stage and an assembly machine is in the second stage. The objective is to minimise a weighted sum of makespan and mean completion time for n available jobs. As this problem is proven to be NP-hard, therefore, we employed an imperialist competitive algorithm (ICA) as solution approach. In the past literature, Torabzadeh and Zandieh (2010 Torabzadeh, E., and M. Zandieh. 2010. “Cloud theory-based Simulated Annealing Approach for Scheduling in the Two-stage Assembly Flow Shop.” Advances in Engineering Software 41: 1238–1243.[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) showed that cloud theory-based simulated annealing algorithm (CSA) is an appropriate meta-heuristic to solve the problem. Thus, to justify the claim for ICA capability, we compare our proposed ICA with the reported CSA. A new parameters tuning tool, neural network, for ICA is also introduced. The computational results clarify that ICA performs better than CSA in quality of solutions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Seidgar et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: