Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The polypeptide binding and release cycle of the molecular chaperone DnaK (Hsp70) of Escherichia coli is regulated by the two co-chaperones DnaJ and GrpE. Here, we show that the DnaJ-triggered conversion of DnaK.ATP (T state) to DnaK.ADP.Pi (R state), as monitored by intrinsic protein fluorescence, is monophasic and occurs simultaneously with ATP hydrolysis. This is in contrast with the T-->R conversion in the absence of DnaJ which is biphasic, the first phase occurring simultaneously with the hydrolysis of ATP (Theyssen, H., Schuster, H.-P., Packschies, L., Bukau, B., and Reinstein, J. (1996) J. Mol. Biol. 263, 657-670). Apparently, DnaJ not only stimulates ATP hydrolysis but also couples it with conformational changes of DnaK. In the absence of GrpE, DnaJ forms a tight ternary complex with peptide.DnaK.ADP.Pi (Kd = 0.14 microM). However, by monitoring complex formation between DnaK (1 microM) and a fluorophore-labeled peptide in the presence of ATP (1 mM), DnaJ (1 microM), and varying concentrations of the ADP/ATP exchange factor GrpE (0.1-3 microM), substoichiometric concentrations of GrpE were found to shift the equilibrium from the slowly binding and releasing, high-affinity R state of DnaK completely to the fast binding and releasing, low-affinity T state and thus to prevent the formation of a long lived ternary DnaJ. substrate.DnaK.ADP.Pi complex. Under in vivo conditions with an estimated chaperone ratio of DnaK:DnaJ:GrpE = 10:1:3, both DnaJ and GrpE appear to control the chaperone cycle by transient interactions with DnaK.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pierpaoli et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: