Why the study?
Do interventions for postoperative infection, VTE, and nausea/vomiting improve outcomes in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery?
Do interventions for postoperative infection, VTE, and nausea/vomiting improve outcomes in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery?
In laparoscopic surgery, routine antibiotics and VTE prophylaxis may be unnecessary for low-risk patients, whereas serotonin receptor antagonists are effective for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports omitting routine prophylaxis in low-risk laparoscopic cases; extends evidence favoring serotonin antagonists for PONV.
Best practices for reducing risks of postoperative infection, venous thromboembolism, and nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery are uncertain. As a result, perioperative care varies widely. We reviewed evidence from randomized clinical trials on the effectiveness of interventions for postoperative infection, venous thromboembolism, and nausea and vomiting Data sources were the Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials, reference lists of published trials, and randomized clinical trials published in English since 1990. Trials were also limited to those focused on patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. Data from 98 randomized clinical trials were included in the final analysis. Routine antibiotic use in laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and possibly other clean procedures not involving placement of prostheses, is likely unnecessary. Similarly, venous thromboembolism prophylaxis is probably unnecessary for low-risk patients undergoing brief procedures. Of a wide variety of methods for reducing postoperative nausea and vomiting, serotonin receptor antagonists appear the most effective and should be considered for routine prophylaxis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Goldfaden et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: