Why the study?
Arterial stiffness and diabetes interact to increase CVD risk, making sensitive biomarkers needed to estimate arterial stiffness risk in T2DM.
Is the metabolic score for visceral fat (METS-VF) associated with the progression of arterial stiffness in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus?
Is the metabolic score for visceral fat (METS-VF) associated with the progression of arterial stiffness in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus?
METS-VF is significantly associated with the progression of arterial stiffness in patients with Type 2 diabetes, highlighting its potential as a biomarker for cardiovascular risk.
METS-VF may aid risk stratification in T2DM; leaves open incremental value and need for prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: Arterial stiffness is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). There is an interaction effect between arterial stiffness and diabetes and may increase the risk of CVD. It is important to find a sensitive biomarker to estimate the risk of arterial stiffness in Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). METHODS: Participants with type 2 diabetes mellites registered at the Metabolic management center (MMC) of Beijing Luhe Hospital. The association between METS-VF and the progression of arterial stiffness (AS) was evaluated using a logistical regression model, and the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were reported and visualizing the risk of arterial stiffness by drawing restricted cubic splines. The trajectory of the metabolic score for visceral Fat (METS-VF) was fitted with the latent class mixture model (LCMM). Moreover, the Cross-lagged panel model was performed to detect the bidirectional cross-lagged associations between METS-VF and brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV). RESULTS: A total of 701 participants enrolled in the procedure of data analysis. The OR (95%CI) of METS-VF on arterial stiffness progression was 1.54 (1.02, 2.36). We identified three discrete trajectories of METS-VF, the ORs (95%CI) in three trajectories were 1.00 (reference), 1.56 (1.02,2.40), 3.33 (1.65, 6.80), respectively. And there were significant bidirectional cross-lagged associations between METS-VF and baPWV after adjusting for confounding factors, β1 and β2 were 0.025 (95%CI:0.006,0.045, P = 0.011) and 0.211 (95%:0.109,0.312, P < 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: There was a causal relationship between METS-VF and the progression of arterial stiffness in T2DM. The series of results provided high-quality evidence that controlling METS-VF may affect the progression of arterial stiffness in T2DM. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: